E D I T O R I A L
Thursday, April 19: A Tale of Three Directors
The earliest connection I could find between Sammo Hung and Tsui Hark
was 1983. Zu: Warriors from the Magic Mountain
came out that year; it was directed by Tsui Hark and featured Sammo
Hung in a small supporting role. Two years later, Yes,
Madam! was released; the film was made by Sammo Hung's production
company and featured Tsui Hark as an actor in a small supporting role.
The next time they worked together (as far as I can tell from examining
the invaluable resource HKMDB)
was in late 1996 and early 1997, when Hung directed and Tsui produced
Once Upon a Time in China and America (OUATIC VI).
Tsui's first credit as a producer, however, came about a year after
the release of Yes, Madam! - A Better Tomorrow.
That film sparked the stagnant directorial career of John Woo to life.
Reportedly, Woo wanted to make a prequel to the story, but Tsui wanted
to focus on different characters. The generally poor result (A
Better Tomorrow II, released in December 1997) also may reflect
the two filmmakers' fighting over the editing.
More details can be found (among other places) at the excellent hardboiled.de
site.
The Killer was released in July 1989
and grossed HK $18 million. The success of the film evidently exacerbated
the differences between the two men, as each wanted the bulk of the
credit. Tsui decided to make the next film in the ABT series himself,
and Woo moved on with his partner Terence Chang. A
Better Tomorrow III was released in October 1989 and grossed
HK $18.4 million.
What's
fascinating to me is that ABT III seems to be made in the style of John
Woo! The style is especially noticeable in the excessive use of slow
motion, but also in the choreography of the gun battles. The quick pace
of the editing is also similar to ABT I & II and The Killer. (As
a whole, the film is not on the same level as Bullet in the Head; on
the other hand, the strong role for Anita Mui is entirely typical of
Tsui and missing from Woo's canon.) Of course, one of the bones of contention
between the two was the editing of the first two ABT films. So who was
more responsible, Woo or Tsui?
Woo is in danger of becoming a parody of himself. Consider his American
output: the briskly paced and entertaining Hard
Target and Broken Arrow led to
the sometimes overwrought and generally ridiculous Face/Off
(with, it must be admitted, some genuinely touching moments, but also
egregious overacting by both Nicholas Cage and John Travolta) and the
turgid and bloated excesses of Mission: Impossible
2 (a film I am guilty of overpraising upon its initial release).
And let's simply shake our heads in wonder (was he doing someone a favor?)
that Woo left his name on the truly wretched Canadian television films
Once a Thief and Blackjack. Comparing the past decade's worth of movies
from both Woo and Tsui (whose career is not exactly mistake-free), I
conclude that Tsui helped Woo improve his style. Woo had a couple of
stories to tell - and what great stories they were - and then ran out
of ideas. He is now apparently content to direct blockbuster action
movies for American studios. There's nothing morally evil about that.
He still displays a bit of style and flourish, and if his success encourages
viewers to seek out the work of other HK filmmakers, so much the better.
If he ever again makes a movie as poetically beautiful and emotionally
moving as A Better Tomorrow, The Killer, or Bullet in the Head, it will
be a shock, but a pleasant one.
On the other hand, I think Tsui Hark is entirely capable of making
another great movie. He's done it too many times in too many different
genres in the past to think that he's finished creatively - no matter
how many mixed reviews I read of his latest, Time
and Tide!
Getting back to Sammo Hung, the point I wanted to make is that, like
Tsui Hark, he was faced with the task of making the latest film in a
series whose creative signature had been forged by another director.
In Tsui's case, it was John Woo; in Hung's case, it was Tsui Hark.
The first three films in the Once Upon a Time in China series were
incredibly well received by audiences and critics alike. Jet Li, however,
did not return for the fourth or fifth films, which had greatly diminished
box office returns. Tsui Hark had returned to helm OUATIC V, but that
still didn't help. Tsui let the franchise lay dormant for a couple of
years, then brought in Sammo Hung as both director and action choreographer.
Jet Li also returned as the legendary Wong Fei Hung.
The
resultant film, Once Upon a Time in China and
America, is wildly uneven but also madly entertaining in a goofy,
b-movie sort of way. Hung's directorial style remained his own - the
camera often veers crazily, whiplash fashion, not cutting within a scene,
following the action. Rather than trying to imitate the first three
films' style in an attempt to repeat their success, Hung seemed to do
it his own way, with little apparent interference from Tsui (who can
be seen on the set and occasionally consulting with Hung in the "making
of" feature on the DVD). OUATIC VI was released in February 1997
and grossed HK $30 million. No doubt Jet Li's return to the role that
made him a star was the main selling point.
Is there a moral to this story? No. I just wanted to talk about these
three directors . . .
As
long as I've mentioned Jet Li, I also saw his last HK film, Hitman.
I liked it way more than I should. It's really not that good, story-wise
or action-wise, but I liked the humorous tone and the interplay between
Li and Eric Tsang, as well as Simon Lam's performance. I recommend it
as a low-priority rental. The more I see of Jet Li, the more I like
him; the sad thing is that I'm running out of movies to see!
If time allows, I'll post my reviews of Option Zero and Hit Team later
today or tomorrow. In brief, Option Zero
was excellent and is a recommended purchase; Hit
Team was less successful but is worth a rental (unless you have
an aversion to weapon-worshipping movies).

I
also watched First Option (run-of-the-mill
action, distinguished by its jungle-like setting in the latter scenes)
and Beast Cops (extremely brutal, bloody,
and memorable, with a great performance by Anthony Wong). Both are recommended
as rentals; Beast Cops may be a purchase possibility but it's more of
a (harrowing) drama than an action film.
Please feel free to e-mail
me your comments, whether positive or negative.

peter
Editor / Reviewer / Webmaster
Current
Editorial | Current
Index
Previous Editorials
Supermodels
of the HK Film World (4/12/01)
What are you
prepared to do? (4/6/01)
Academy Awards
Special (3/26/01)
The Price of
Success (3/19/01)
Is Jackie Chan
Still the Man? part 1 (3/12/01)
Great Expectations
(3/7/01)
In the Mood for
Change (2/26/01)
Bronchitis on
the Brain (2/12/01)
Hong Kong Sequel
Blues (2/5/01)
Better or Best?
(1/29/01)
To Dub or Not
to Dub (1/22/01)
Scenes From a
Fractured Skull (1/15/01)
Year-End Round-Up
(1/7/01)
Briefly noted
(12/31/00)
Wuxia Fantasies
and the Black-and-White Western (12/24/00)
Raiders of the
lost heart (12/17/00)
The movie week
in review (12/10/00)
Redesigning
A Better Tomorrow (12/3/00)
The fantasy begins
again (11/26/00)
A return and
a shortened work week, hurrah! (11/20/00)
That blasted
job! (11/12/00)
Hollywood, Jet,
Jackie, Fred, and Gene (11/6/00)
Did you want
blood with that? (10/30/00)
Do you like cold
pizza? (10/24/00)
Preparing for
the Legend (10/16/00)
The pauper must
pay (10/10/00)
A visit to Five
Star Laser (10/05/00)
A brief vacation
(9/25/00)
The editor's
plea (8/20/00)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
corrections? broken
links? criticism? praise? please e-mail webmaster
this site is a non-commercial resource for region 1
original content copyright 2001 peter a. martin all rights reserved