The director's previous film, The Hole, was dramatically
and visually uninvolving when I tried to watch it on television. On
a much larger cinema screen, Tsai Ming-Liang's drab palette and static
framing commands the viewer's attention to a far greater degree.
All color has drained away from the lives of the
main characters. Two of them live together in Taipei, Taiwan, but it
is the actions of a third that sets the plot in motion. She wants to
buy a street peddler's dual-zone watch for her trip to Paris; the peddler
initially resists. Not only is it his own personal watch, but since
his father has only recently died, it would bring bad fortune to the
woman were she to buy it while he is still in mourning. She persists,
taking his card and phoning him several times, and he relents the next
day. As a thank you, she buys him a small cake and departs.
His life previous to his encounter with the woman
has been ordinary in the extreme. He offers watches by day, and at night
returns home to the apartment he shares with his mother. Beset by quiet
grief, she years for the return of her husband in reincarnated or spirit
form. She searches carefully for any little sign of his return. So when
her son begins setting every available clock to Paris time, she takes
it as a hopeful sign from her husband, and then becomes obsessive about
doing everything possible to hasten his presence.
Her son's decision to change a large variety of
timepieces makes sense, in view of the mundance existence that we've
observed. The small gesture of the Paris-bound woman takes on great
significance in the watch seller's life, and it leads to unexpected
comedy and strange encounters.
The woman herself, seen on a tourist visit that
takes in none of the usual sights, is isolated by her status as a solitary
traveler and her lack of fluency in French. She is distracted by strange
sounds coming from upstairs. She continually tries to make a phone call.
Is she trying to call the watch seller?
Eventually the three ordinary people seek a similar
release of emotion. No one is satisfied, and no questions are answered.
The film requires a great deal of patience. It allows
more breathing space than is needed, especially once its main points
are made, due to its extremely measured pace. The close encounters with
three ordinary people is quite umcomfortable at times, yet is ultimately
rewarding.
See it in a cinema if you can; it has much less
chance of making an impact if viewed on a television screen.
(Reviewed by Peter
A. Martin; March 25, 2002)